However, you do not get to provide interpretation here. This does not mean there is no creativity allowed in the Results section. In fact, the wise writer uses graphs and figures to highlight the most important or interesting information. Otherwise, arrange the results from most to least relevant or strong.
They ask and answer questions. The first step toward answering a question is devising an appropriate test the method. The second part is making the results of the test known — this is the task of the research report and poster presentation.
But before you can design a test or write a paper, you have to have something you wish research -- you need to devise a research question. When a study is designed primarily to describe what is going on or what exists. Public opinion polls that seek only to describe the proportion of people who hold various opinions are primarily descriptive in nature.
For instance, if we want to know what percent of the population would vote for a Democratic or a Republican in the next presidential election, we are simply interested in describing something. When a study is designed to look at the relationships between two or more variables. A public opinion poll that compares what proportion of males and females say they would vote for a Democratic or a Republican candidate in the next presidential election is essentially studying the relationship between gender and voting preference.
When a study is designed to determine whether one or more variables e. If we did a public opinion poll to try to determine whether a recent political advertising campaign changed voter preferences, we would essentially be studying whether the campaign cause changed the proportion of voters who would vote Democratic or Republican effect.
The three question types can be viewed as cumulative. That is, a relational study assumes that you can first describe by measuring or observing each of the variables you are trying to relate.
And, a causal study assumes that you can describe both the cause and effect variables and that you can show that they are related to each other. Causal studies are probably the most demanding of the three. A Process for Formulating Questions A good Research Question RQ is specific enough to be answered, broad enough to be discussed, and significant enough to be of interest to the field.
This is not as difficult to create as it sounds! Below are some tips to help you formulate a RQ that is both personally meaningful and researchable. A successful RQ has two main parts, a topic and something asked about that topic. The "what about the topic" also comes from your interests but is formulated using the "wh-question words": So, after determining the topic and some idea of "what about" the topic, do the following: Now, after this, you should be able to put together a Research Question that is both interesting and researchable.
Example What about the topic: What causes eating disorders? Is it a cause-and-effect relationship? Maybe "influences" is better Research Question: What factors influence eating disorders?
Can RQ be narrowed? What factors influence the beginning or development of eating disorders? Experimenting with the wh-questions: Why do eating disorders occur? How many kinds of eating disorders are there? Who gets eating disorders? What treatments are available for eating disorders? When do eating disorder start?
Once you've answered that question -- which is "yes" and you'll discover that within 3 minutes of beginning a literature search -- what are you going to do? You may have such a question in your head because you don't know the answer, but once the basic question is answered, you'll need to form more questions, ex: True existence questions only work for a topic that has truly never been researched before or when the existence of a thing is predicted but not proven for example, the Higgs-Bosun particle in physics.Understanding psychological research by finding a problem, discovering the clues, and evaluating the evidence.
The Psychologist as Detectives introduces students to the research process. The authors treat psychological research as a detective case in which a problem is presented, clues are discovered, evidence is evaluated, and a report is prepared for consideration by peers. The Schutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT) is a 33 item self-report measure of emotional intelligence developed by Schutte et al.
(). Dawn M. McBride is a professor of psychology at Illinois State University.
Her research interests include automatic forms of memory, false memory, prospective memory, and forgetting. She has taught courses in introductory psychology, statistics, research methods, cognition and learning, human memory, and a graduate course in experimental design.
Hire a highly qualified essay writer to cater for all your content needs. Whether you struggle to write an essay, coursework, research paper, annotated bibliography or dissertation, we’ll connect you with a screened academic writer for effective writing assistance.
Paper Masters Custom Research Papers on Evaluating a Psychological Test Paper Masters writes custom research papers on evaluating a psychological test and delve into an example of an order placed on a test evaluation. This review covers the basic elements of a research report.
This is a general guide for what you will see in journal articles or dissertations. This format assumes a mixed methods study, but you can leave out either quantitative or qualitative sections if you only used a single methodology.