Along with New Zealand, Australia became the second country in the Asia-Pacific region to to make same-sex marriage legal. Germany On June 30,Germany became the 15th European country to enact legislation allowing same-sex couples to wed. Colombia On April 28,Colombia became the fourth country in Catholic-majority South America to legalize same-sex marriage, following Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil.
Supreme Court ruled on Friday that it is legal for all Americans, no matter their gender or sexual orientation, to marry the people they love. The decision is a historic victory for gay rights activists who have fought for years in the lower courts.
Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia already recognize marriage equality. The remaining 13 states ban these unions, even as public support has reached record levels nationwide. The justices found that, under the 14th Amendment, states must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex unions that have been legally performed in other states.
In a rare move, the four dissenting justices each wrote an opinion. The lead plaintiff in Obergefell v. Hodges is Ohio resident Jim Obergefell, who wanted to be listed as the surviving spouse on his husband's death certificate. Arthur passed away in October of that year, three months after the couple filed their lawsuit.
Obergefell was joined by several dozen other gay plaintiffs from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee who were fighting to be able to marry and to have their marriage recognized in every state in the country. In the majority opinionthe justices outlined several reasons same-sex marriage should be allowed.
They wrote that the right to marriage is an inherent aspect of individual autonomy, since "decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can make. These five justices were in the majority in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.
Getty Extending the right to marry protects families and "without the recognition, stability, and predictability marriage offers, children suffer the stigma of knowing their families are somehow lesser," the justices wrote.
The majority concluded that the right for same-sex couples to marry is protected under the 14th Amendment, citing the clauses that guarantee equal protection and due process. Celebrate the availability of new benefits," they wrote. And if intimacy is, one would think Freedom of Intimacy is abridged rather than expanded by marriage.
Ask the nearest hippie. Inthe Supreme Court began chipping away at the country's legacy of discrimination against same-sex couples when it struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act, which prevented same-sex couples whose marriages were recognized by their home state from receiving the hundreds of benefits available to other married couples under federal law.
In its opinion, the majority recognized the profound cultural shifts in marriage views, citing both the Chinese educator Confucius and the Roman philosopher Cicero.
The justices noted how marriage has been transformed from a union arranged by a couple's parents for financial reasons to a voluntary contract, and from a male-dominated relationship to an agreement where women have "equal dignity. President Barack Obama became the first sitting president to support marriage equality when he came out in favor of it inthe same year that the Democratic Party made it part of its platform for the first time.
On Friday, Obama called the ruling " a victory for America. Scott Walker R support a constitutional amendment protecting states that want to ban marriage equality. Some conservatives have advocated for a civil disobedience effort against a Supreme Court decision in favor of same-sex marriage.
However, officials in red states told The Huffington Post recently that they are prepared to implement the decision, going so far as to ready gender-neutral marriage licenses and set later office hours. Gerard Rickhoff, who oversees marriage licenses in Bexar County, Texas, said that if same-sex couples are discriminated against elsewhere in the state, "Just get in your car and come on down the highway.
You'll be embraced here. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law.
The Constitution grants them that right.The debate can go round and around and the answer to the question of legalizing same sex marriages is not as easy as it may seem. There are solid rebuttals to any supposition one makes on the issue, making the debate a lot more interesting than one might believe.
However, the rebuttal to this counter argument would be that the sexual. Same-sex marriage has been a controversial social issue but public opinion on this topic seems to be evolving. Same-sex marriage should be legalized in the Philippines because the government has no legitimate reason to limit marriage to opposite sex couples only.
All citizens of the Philippines deserve to have equal access to marriage and the [ ]. Jun 26, · Same-sex marriage supporters rejoice outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Friday after the U.S Supreme Court handed down a ruling regarding same-sex marriage.
Rebuttals to arguments for same-sex marriage Examining the most common arguments for redefining marital unions These aftereffects have already been observed in countries that have legalized same-sex marriage. For example, in Brazil and the Netherlands, three-way relationships were recently granted the full rights of marriage.
Dec 07, · Same-sex couples in Canada gained most of the legal benefits of marriage in when the federal and provincial governments extended common law marriages to gay and lesbian couples.
Through a series of court cases beginning in , same-sex marriage gradually became legal in nine of the country’s 13 provinces and territories.
Legalizing Gay Marriages: Rebuttal Essay Gay Marriages Make Them Legal: Rebuttal Thomas Stoddard’s Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal, has some valid points, but I am not convinced nor persuaded to agree that gay marriages should be legalized.