I have also read that medical marijuana reduces the growth of tumor in lung cancer patients.
March 22, at 6: Endometriosis is particularly under-served at the non-specialist tier, with significant knowledge deficits contributing directly to the consequential diagnostic delays, sub-optimal treatments and poor outcomes so inherent to the condition.
To that end, a most critical challenge persists: The dedicated treatment of endometriosis in tertiary referral centers remains neither acknowledged nor recognized by bodies of influence including ACOG, and the non-specialist majority continues to shape and inform the guidelines for the minority of true specialists who are highly capable of diagnosing and treating even the most complex of manifestations with great success.
Recognizing these significant differences in invasive, adhesive and proliferative behaviors are important — critical even — to unlocking pathways which could one day lead to better understanding of the enigmatic disease and perhaps even universal cure. Research also remains sorely lacking.
Data also routinely conflicts e. Association between body mass index and endometriosis risk: Requisite invasive diagnosis notwithstanding, it is not necessarily difficult to suspect endometriosis in many of those who are suffering and assist them towards a timely diagnostic pathway, as hallmark signs often present early in life: Complete laparoscopic excision of endometriosis in teenagers: Moreover, while it is prudent to rule out differential diagnoses, physical examination and lab studies related to an endometriosis diagnosis have poor sensitivity, specificity and predictive values and thus they cannot be used to firmly diagnose — or rule out — the disease.
Clinicians must also consider non-gynecologic symptoms as well, of course, but whereas some gynecologic providers will recognize the signs in their patients, non OBGYN clinicians are all too often poorly versed in the diagnostic workup of the disease — with direct consequences on delay in diagnosis and proper intervention.
Still other data reflects what patients have said for years: Journal of General Internal Medicine. Ironically, the same guidelines issued on this topic indeed recognize the failure of medical suppression to treat the disease: Conservative Approach is First-Line Treatment.
Likewise, far too many conclusions about treatment itself have been largely based on limited studies with sub-optimal design and more importantly, on the mistaken assumption that all surgery for endometriosis is performed by surgeons of similar caliber, overlooking the wide discrepancy that actually exists [Albee].
Such postulation does not address the issue of completeness in removing all disease at the time of diagnosis and ignores the excellent results of truly skilled excisionists with adequate experience in disease recognition and total resection.
Policies continue to advocate for and reward hysterectomy which may be needless in many cases ; expensive, ineffective medical therapy that has never been proven to confer long-term relief; and incomplete operative measures, and fail to recognize endometriosis care as a specialty — a grave injustice to those seeking quality care.
Even those who are ultimately directed towards effective resources for quality care may find themselves faced with insurmountable insurance and financial barriers; one of which could be straightforwardly addressed by classifying Laparoscopic Excision under its own code, thus demonstrating not all destruction of endometriosis is of equal efficacy and available in every setting.
That it is neither the single element of a high-quality multidisciplinary approach nor universally effective for every single patient notwithstanding, Laparoscopic Excision remains a feasible technique which can be extremely effective in reducing pain, improving quality of life, restoring fertility and anatomic function, and preserving healthy organs in the majority of patients with the disease — a stark contrast to ablation and other superficial surgeries so routinely performed by subspecialists.
The skill and compassion of the many providers who are restoring the quality of life and markedly improving the health and well-being of their patients every day — in spite of the failing guidelines endorsed and embraced by many outside the dedicated centers of excellence — should be acknowledged and recognized for the specialty it is.
All concerned with endometriosis and pelvic pain will — or should — agree that increased, accurate awareness and early, quality intervention is indeed requisite to reduce the morbidity, infertility and progressive symptomatology of the disease in affected patients of all ages.
It is even clearer that failures to diagnose and treat effectively through well-timed approaches by those who can truly excise — particularly in cases of deep disease — are of great consequence to patients.
One need only spend a short time truly immersed in the patient population to realize the far-reaching physical and emotional impact of endometriosis and the toll which repeated surgical and medical interventions take, though the literature is often far removed from such first-hand experience s. Legislators, payers and the bench to beltway organizations who ostensibly advocate for endometriosis must be fervently appealed to with a plea to reconsider current precedents and move towards increased — accurate — education, awareness and training, and well-timed referrals to those who practice a gold standard multidisciplinary approach for the best care of individuals with the disease; for if we are to continue to accept the status quo, we will continue to do little to advance.
It is imperative that endometriosis is elevated to a priority public health platform and the specialty treatment of the disease receives the recognition it deserves.
Indeed, those affected by endometriosis have been talking about the highly negatively impact the disease has on the social, physical, emotional and sexual aspects of their life for decades; perhaps the time has finally come to listen.Sep 15, · Expert Reviewed.
How to Write a Medical Research Paper. Two Parts: Researching Your Paper Writing Your Paper Community Q&A Writing a medical research paper is similar to writing other research papers in that you want to use reliable sources, write in a clear and organized style, and offer a strong argument for all conclusions you 88%().
Concerning disease, research papers report that the medical field believes that disease is the result of physical changes within the body. This philosophy of science has led to a narrow focus upon pathogens that create illness.
The single best way to prevent seasonal flu is to get vaccinated each year, but good health habits like covering your cough and washing your hands often can help stop the spread of germs and prevent respiratory illnesses like the flu.
There also are flu antiviral drugs that can be used to treat and prevent flu. The tips and resources below will help you learn about steps you can take to. Ronda Rousey tells TMZ Sports pulling out of the WWE event in Saudi Arabia would be the WRONG move, because there is SO much good that can ultimately come from it.
Research within librarian-selected research topics on Diseases and Disorders from the Questia online library, including full-text online books, academic journals, magazines, newspapers and more.
Writing a Clinical Vignette (Case Report) Abstract. Other twists include an unusual complication of a disease and its management. Again, it's important to think about the message or lesson that the case can deliver.
It typically takes several days to write a good abstract, and the process should not be undertaken alone.